Judge violates Charter of Rights and fabricates evidence

PDF's to the evidence:

Chapter 11 & 15 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms Violations

Fabricated evidence by the Judge in this wrongful conviction

Response to the judges decision

The true definition of a Ponzi scheme.

What is a Ponzi scheme?

A ponzi scheme is an organization with strong ties to private and public centers of power.

A ponzi scheme must first be able to dominate it's image through media outlets who exchange influential positions as experts for ad revenue. Generally, the print, radio or tv organization will quote and or interview from organization/bank (x) while carrying ads for them. It seems reasonable that recently it dawned on everyone that these "experts" would have to disclose if they had a vested interest in the success of the investments that they recommended to reveal their conflict of interest. It would be better if the media outlet would end the segment with how much financing they receive from bank (X), ad revenue and how much investment the organization has in that outlet or any of it's subsidiaries.

A ponzi scheme must wield uncanny clout in the corridors of power. In a situation where there is increasing outrage about using public depositors funds for personal bonuses to keep up exotic lifestyles while failing (at their job to make money), it's nice to know that you will be receiving MORE public funds with no whisper of indicting, raiding, closing, prosecuting or convicting anyone.

According to our blood money recipients (media and government), the economic downturn exposes lack of expertise, fraud and ponzi's like madoff and standford. This economic downturn somehow failed to expose and cause media derision & government assault on scotia/caisse or jpmorgan/bank of america. They hear the public outcry for punishment about the inequity in them going unpunished and spend day and night arresting and running stories about relative small timers whom you've never heard of and don't affect the public at large.

Maybe charles ponzi would be proud of madoff but he definitely would be more proud of the g-8 governments and media outlets, that are still attempting to talk past the crimes by these organizations that brought civilization to it's knee's.

Now exclude these organizations from the ponzi scheme checklist:

This is the type of trivia that has your mind racing to keep all banks from being ponzi schemes. Unfortunately for our corrupt friends in the media and government the law requires guilt to be based on the accepted practices of an industry. This means a judge who doesn't know anything about running a nuclear plant can't simply find someone guilty of acting recklessly at one. The first measure is to find if the person acted in a credible fashion for his/her occupation/industry e.g. it can't be reckless if it is the standard practice and would have been the action of 9/10 other informed professionals.

How this applies to all of the ponzi/fraud cases out there is how can a public constantly exposed to banks expect anything other than those practices listed above. Since these institutions are considered the standard bearers of the industry, how can a prosecutor not look to them for what would be acceptable practice.

You ever notice that most of these people have some banking/brokerage background? It would seem that they picked it up from the source and after watching media and government confer so much reverence and respect on these organizations, figured that this must be the proper way to do it. What a shock it must be to wake up arrested while your mentor continues to receive support. If some of these people are crooks, we know they learned from the best ;)

p to the mutherfkn s

A washington post article referred to bankers as casualties of the economic downturn. The point of the article was actually just to put that lie into the public psyche. It is outlandish right now while it's happening and fresh on everyone's mind that the banks are the culprits. Sell that ad space, dawg!

Here's a refresher: Northern rock a british bank experiences a run(when the legitimate banks are asked to make good on all of their statements and can't).

google some "legitimate names for your future investments: Bnp paribas halt's withdrawals:

UBS helps wealthy steal from federal government. Remember bear stearns and lehman bros.? Oh and don't forget the state of cali FORNia wih AH-nold. Weren't there banks called wachovia and washington mutual once upon a time?

Also governments around the world are creating "bad banks" to buy all the red ink off of the banks balance sheets. So that they can survive and we can pretend that they weren't inept crooks who destroyed 50 years of generated wealth. This is like someone buying all of your debt from you with cash, your bad credit is purchased from you and cleaned up, while you keep your assets. We all could benefit from a corrupt deal like that, hell most of madoff clients would be better off it madoff would have made the list of corrupt titans eligible for a bailout.

What industry and government crony told the post to print this nazi style propaganda?
No wonder all the media outlets are going bankrupt.

Monkey economics for a banana republic

Monkey economics for a banana republic

Hello to all you first world chimps, welcome to the state of fiat supremacy. We have (under your very noses and fat bellies) created the greatest oligarchy in history. Here's a summary: generally an elite ruling class would need to hoard material wealth, gold, land or other tangibles then control access to them. The fiat oligarchy allows us to create a state of global debt bondage by manipulating keystroke wealth (wealth that only exist in digital form on computer screens). We simply add as many zeros as we like and our wealth grows instantly and without any need for the actual creation or use of anything. What would be considered pathetic cronyism and corruption in the rest of the world is considered sound economic fundamentals in the west. What I love most about our Rothschild style central banking oligarchy is we pick the winners and losers. For over 60 years westerners have felt very privileged to feel a bit better about themselves thanks to fiat debt. A fiat (faux) middle class of people feeling superior to other nationalities and ethnicities because they didn't receive the same access to fiat based credit. Our plan wasn't simply to bloat your ego but to have you become addicted. We were amazed at our success and how so many of you were willing to pay back money plus interest on money that never existed. For a few fiat zeros you guys would sign over your lifetime of work, even though we would never really allow you to "own" anything. When we foreclose on your home it's not to repay money that we lost but to actually allow us to take something of value for our digitized fiat. We'll take your home and all your future wages to pay back money we never really gave you.

It's awesome I'm enamored with our brilliance. So lets talk third world, which ironically no longer exist since the fiat crisis has been a great equalizer. Every nation on the planet is promising another entire generation of bondage to repay a debt based on fiat. The yoke will be higher prices and taxes in a futile attempt to become "fiscally sound" (like we'd let that happen). Have you ever noticed that every government "surplus" is followed by a deficit? The hope of ever escaping digitized debt bondage is only for the morale of the weak minded. Weak minded people who keep trying to pay off credit cards no matter how many times the loan amount is paid. I wish more of you could be part of the elite oligarchy but it wouldn't be elite then would it? God has chosen you and your fellow chumps...oops I meant chimps (sorry) to be part of an indentured/indebted class, like black sharecroppers after the "abolition" of slavery.

Let's go over the details of your banana status. Imperialism created banana republics, most of these former colonial holdings were treated as factories to supply sugar and yes bananas to there imperial predators. Once colonialism was "over" these nations were still stuck with an enriched elite from their feeder nation days. Like diamonds, gold, sugar and again bananas and no indigenous group created Debeers or Chiquita. Then you need first world goods so you can "develop" so you have to sell sugar, rice and yes bananas to buy these things. first it's going to take a lot of bananas to purchase earthmover's and airplanes and even more spiteful the imperial predators subsidize thier farming industry and have you compete against other feeder nations to drive the price of your commodity down. Next comes the idea that they will loan you the money to get on your feet but they will need to be in complete control of your government until the loan is repaid (neo-colonialism--from the west run IMF/world bank). First order of business is to let huge multinationals take over your resources, water, land, oil, gold etc. Second, deprive your citizens of the resources and improvements that you took out the loan for in the first place, so you can lower taxes to create room to repay the loan. Compliance will bring about civil unrest and defiance (trying to use the resources for the citizens) will force them to finance a proxy war, isolate your nation or invade. At the very least you will be marginalized like Chavez for pushing the IMF out of the America's.

Being the xenophobia racist that you are we know that you loathe to empathize with a non-western/white nation. In this instance I think you should make an exception, so that you may familiarize yourself with the procedure that we have perfected on these mud people nations. The funny thing is that the manufacturing & production base have long been sucked out the west, so most western nations don't even have bananas to barter with. We'll have to call you the non-farm having,fishing, forestry, mining defunct, dead manufacturing republics. We've added cars, aeronautics, engineering and medicine to the global list of tradable commodities. So now you will have to prove to me why your engineering work is worth more than that of the son of a rice stomper in china or why your medical opinion is worth more than that of a doctor in rural India. Efficiency drives the marketplace, so we told the banana producers that they would have to grow more and make them cheaper. During the now defunct industrial age, factory workers found themselves competing globally. I'm a little (just a little) sad that we were not able to give you at least a generation of false security in the information age but we all know time is fiat. We couldn't wait to move the call centers and have your x-rays examined half a world away. I really don't know what fat, spoiled, pasty westerners have to offer in this NEW new economy. Actually, I hear that a zoo in the amazon is looking for disillusioned westerners to grow bananas for the monkeys.

Duplicity or Stupidity

Frontpage from aid4families: Prosecutors said that the people that believed that an economic 9/11 was coming in aug. 07 were "weak naive and greedy", obviously since the banks remained great stewards of the economy and lived under the same laws. Also we know that an economic explosion never occurred--yeah right?











Most people don't know what I'm talking about but most people think the crisis started six months ago, so...

july 2008--- A year after I continued to warn people and spending articles telling the rest of the world they weren't immune to the crisis, I see this. Bank of canada says, worst behind us circa summer 08.




Where was the AMF for the six banks and the 34 billion in ABCP or deceptive banking practices that the government still refuses to address but makes arrest for with everyone else?


The Caisse de Depot chief: after running the ponzi scheme with the other Canadian banks for a $36billion debacle, drying up the entire pension system in Quebec. He simply talks down to parliament then takes a cushy job next door.
The unguarantee guarantee that was too crooked for wall st. The guarantee on the ABCP ponzi in Canada was so crooked that even the vipers on wall st. wouldn't rate it and called it "worthless"



I read in court about the Canadian standard of proof for fraud and was given the impression that fraud is "whatever we say it is and we know it when we see it" yeah see if that allows you to forgo the burden.

Jail as repression, jailing Mandela protected apartheid, jailing Christ stop Christianity, jailing MLK kept segregation or does it just piss people off.

These people had the audacity to be offended that I was saying the system was hypocritical but here's the test.

question 1. Is every regulator, law maker, law enforcement officer, court and prosecutor aware of complaints and lawsuits and complaints about abusive, deceptive-fraudulent practices by the banks. Yes OR No? if no, then why not?

question 2. How many have been raided and shutdown with all the depositors refunded and damages awarded? 1 of the the top 6 Canadian banks, 2 of the 6, 3 of the 6 or none of the 6. If none, then why not?

Why does too big to fail really mean too chicken shit to try to jail?

Basically, if a bank CEO blows your brains out in broad daylight on a busy street with video camera's watching, the only thing that would come of it is your family would receive a bill for the bullet.
Everyone admitted that I hadn't violated the criminal code, the investigators for the RCMP and the securities commission. I can't rely too much on it since neither did an actual investigation before bringing charges.

Only violations that occurred involve selective prosecution. The violation of duplicitous cowards trying to create deceit in a contract that I published online that people could read in advance or send to their attorney. On the other hand we have pages of deliberately archaic disclaimers and confusing text in bank and investment contracts but no raids or closing of bank of America or bank of Montreal by the RCMP or FBI.

They tried to put words in the customers mouths, tried to misread the website but all I ask is where is that benefit of the doubt, like you have for that bankcard your carrying? On the other hand if you see fraud under every tree, in every word and every phrase then all of the banks should be gone by year end because there contracts are a landmine of deceit and dishonesty.

In this crooked sham of a ruse they believe that they can keep misapplying the law and make it up as they go along. So I'm glad that they picked me and I'm glad that they picked this moment in history when everyone is losing everything because they were too busy jailing bank competitors and looking the other way for for the banks misdeeds.

Said I addressed fraud in my statement to the police and in my video evidence and my testimony as proof that I was a crook. What was I suppose to talk about, underwater basket weaving? You're the fool that charged me with fraud and when I address it head on it's proof of my guilt?

I let them know that they can try to cover for each other as long as they see fit. Add wrongful conviction to malicious prosecution to false imprisonment, it won't be the first time. The thing I know for sure after 2 years of this BS is that I will still be the one to finish what they started and will plague them to their graves. 20 years from now people will still be asking them about this case and why they thought they could pull a Omar Khadr.

Their problem is that Canada doesn't consider itself a feudal, bigoted, repressive society and wrote up equal protections in it's charter and constitution.

Like all western democracies the practices couldn't be further from the ideals. So occasionally someone has to hold a mirror up to the society in it's supreme court and demand and explanation for the disparity between the self image and reality.

I consider this ordeal part of the growing pains for my organization because I won't have to deal with any slander about fraud or scam. I was offered a year of probation a year ago before the trial. After I refused, I was sentenced to a de facto sentence of one year because they didn't have the case PLUS prison time is back on the table. That's what happens when you're innocent and opt to clear your name instead of plead out.

We're concerned about the sane things, the effects on our children and life but I am not concerned that a conviction could be based on the prosecution getting in the ballpark of fraud. If I'm convicted I will mail everyone involved copies of bank contracts from every bank( you know, since they see fraud in every word or deed, right?) Like Obama said for our entire lifetime everyone has needed a magnifying glass and a reference manual for bank contracts. As Dick Durbin admitted (senior senator) The bankers run the place (Washington-law makers and courts). The finance minister in Canada told Canadians not to get their hopes up for the Harper administration to crack down on bank fraud. He wasn't talking about not arresting or prosecuting them, he was only talking about not bothering them with the request to not rip the public off so much.

Yes, now is the time to convict the organization that warned people about the crisis a year and a half before the media or government admitted it. Yes, it's time to convict the organization that didn't put a limit on how much interest they PAID people (which makes you a crook). The people that grease the courts and cops hands still have no limit on how much interest they can CHARGE people. So I can pay 30% or 500% a year but it has to be to a bank or pawn shop, NOT a working family.

If I go to jail for something that stupid, I'll expect Christmas cards from hell from these people because that's an automatic ban from heaven and you have to hate god to defend one practice and persecute the good one.

What I should do is put Scotia bank or JPMorgan at the top of the contract and change the payments to interest charges, so they will be to cowardice to bother me.

No one involved knew a thing about investments or it seems private contracts either. They were so busy talking about red flags and the inevitability of failure for my organization that I never was allowed the opportunity to consider a crime.

When Tom cruise came out with minority report, I thought it would be about the over prosecution and sentencing disparities for minorities. It was close since it was still about arresting people before a crime based on dreams. He was very gung ho until it was turned on him and I can imagine if any of my attackers were tried with this case. Actually I can't since people commit suicide for less stress than this and hypocrites are twice as prone. You ever notice when cops are in trouble in movies they fight the investigation then when it comes time to pay their debt to society they shoot themselves?

Conviction, prosecution and investigation would all be based on the same collective delusions and insanity.

The prosecutor in his short incoherent summation only tried to inflame the courts prejudices by trying to compare the program to a ponzi scheme. Also by saying how little either of them need for a fraud conviction(the practice of the law--not the letter and for sure not the spirit). Selective prosecution says that if they can't find it in the organizations that own the homes(conflict of interest) then they shouldn't be able to find it anywhere else.

They took issues with my video statement even though I was reading, from supreme court lawyers, members of parliament, media quotes of government officials. It was clear that this was fair( a room full of white guys glaring at us).

It boiled down to the fact that they convicted people of fraud for claiming to use the money for a purpose such a buying a certain stock but the people did nothing but pay the people their own money (like Madoff saying he never made a single trade but sent people statements saying he did). Aid4families did the OPPOSITE, made no claims to the specifics of the investments and THEN MADE INVESTMENTS. Despite this being the total opposite of a ponzi scheme and the justification for all the other ponzi/fraud convictions, they remain undeterred in attempting to twist the law and torture themselves into a way to stretch reason and sanity to include us.

Watch this video!!

War on the money changers: Diangel to continue the work of Christ against caste bank.

There isn’t supposed to be a Christian church and there shouldn’t be a system of oppression by usury.

Churches like banks are nearly incidental. The sacrifice of Christ was to eliminate the system of exploitation by government and temple for a promise of paradise in the afterlife. The church came from people who agreed that they didn’t need to go to temple to reach heaven and chose to have their own meetings for guidance and encouragement. Then the eastern Roman Empire purchased Christianity and helped form the autocratic bureaucracy it became. The money changers would only allow their own coins in the temple and the temple as the only way into heaven. So they were enriching themselves with an ever increasing spread in currency exchanging (forex). There is a belief that the Jews killed Jesus but the reality is closer to bankers. You might consider the radical and heretical issues of undercutting roman rule or religious doctrine but it doesn’t get you killed.

Messiahs are a dime a dozen

In the time of Christ as is the case today, there is no shortage of people who feel inspired by the divine (yours truly included). The FBI ran a program called co-intellpro to thwart the civil rights movement and the rise of a “black messiah” (has there ever been one that wasn’t black?). This makes it clear that whenever a group is oppressing another that they will try to stifle hope by suppressing leadership. In the time of Christ, Judaism and the roman occupation were no different and were very sensitive to the rise of any leader. Christ was a mediocre leader by general standards, his core followers were few, teachings were simplistic and he had neither finance, charisma nor weapons to force change. This lackluster organization has even managed to create the question of whether Jesus actually lived. As a morality tale it predicts one significant omen; you can’t change the world of man without confronting the moneychangers. Put into its proper perspective confronting the moneychangers becomes the turning point in his career and makes him a legitimate hero/threat. Alleviating oppression is the fastest way to prison, execution and assassination. Fighting societal oppression wouldn’t have made Jesus the Christ but it did facilitate his divine destiny of sacrifice. The venom and hatred that forced his execution, allowed him to liberate the poor by becoming their dove of sacrifice. An unassuming man completely broke the back of centuries of religious sacrifice by offering his blood in perpetuity. People of course continue to try to purchase a ticket to heaven but at least they know they don’t have to.

Me and Christ have a lot in common

People have asked me about comparing myself to Jesus the Christ, which I find odd as a Christian. As a Christian you have a responsibility to constantly compare yourself and your life to Jesus. Your entire life is supposed to be a close approximation of his example. In my life the things I share with Christ besides both being celebrities from the bible is a battle with money changers in my 30s. I went to tell the people (this time on a website) that credit and banks weren’t your ticket to heaven. I also demanded a more egalitarian system of commerce. A moralistic difference that simply stated the money should work for people not just the other way around. I even went that extra mile and started giving wealth directly to the masses. This is a hysterical taboo as evidenced by the unrelenting venom obama is facing. There was no shortage of writers and speakers about the evils of the national and global banking system but I did something no one else dared to; I actually fixed it and put the remedy into practice. There can only be so many conferences, books and campaigns, eventually the people need someone to take action and wake up in jail. WWJD what would Jesus do? Indeed! And In deed.

Damn you all to hell!! La mort de la culture de l’argent : Banks & the planet of the raped.

We are in a car careening out of control on ice with the brake line cut and they are still trying to steal the remaining pieces in an attempt to have total ownership when we recover. It started as an orchestrated coup by the central and commercial banks to gain ownership of the bulk of global assets. As is always the case with these things, they were so blinded with greed and arrogance that they missed the entire forest for the trees.
Let’s start over, the large multi-national banks were rigging the laws across the globe to allow faster and more frequent consolidation. Nearly every country on earth has fewer banks than a decade ago. The growth of the internet which should have doubled their business actually has turned out to be a more democratic and competitive market place. Democracy and competition have their place; unless you are the one who has the most.

The flow of money as it had been known which would normally allow taxes to be collected and then passed directly to the banks for them to loan back to the public at a profit was crumbling. Why pay $500 per trade if you could trade for $10? Why pay a broker at all when you can trade for yourself and pocket the fees? While they were gaining in one sector by gobbling up smaller banks and dictating political policy, market share was becoming more competitive. Fees and commissions are like store warranties on electronics and are generally 100% profit. It never cost a brokerage $1000 to buy a few shares on your behalf. They could have taken the entire internet by storm by offering discount services to the masses but they believed that the poor spend all of their money; the middle class has a little left to save and only the rich had the means and intelligence to invest. If they offered discount services then they simply would be giving back billions each year in profits. They could no longer simply buy market share through mergers. Sure Toronto dominion could link up with ameritrade but there are tons of online competitors for investing and trading. Even the well-heeled customers began to consider the cost savings in discount fees and so the major banks and brokerages late and begrudgingly rolled out their own over priced online banking services. This was not the only industry to make this mistake, we all remember napster and amazon as entertainment and retail woke up behind the eight ball and determined to turn back the clock on their greedy business model. All the major retailers allow you to purchase online except the largest - wal-mart but this holiday season will surely change this outdated attitude. The auto industry and it’s let them eat cake attitude, the media acting only as a megaphone for industry now wants me to blog on their site or twitter and facebook them. It has all changed in a a world where CNN needs facebook more than the other way around. The free blogs and news submissions are a realization that news was no longer going to be determined by a few people with a common life experience. The thought now is that what started with the banks has spread to retail and media among others but the truth is the banks are only the most recent to have to deal with the new reality. They were able to determine who became middle class or rich, whether cars would stay old tech or if new tech could gain their favor and that the media conglomerates would be the captains of information. Why would the retailers, media and industry change, they were the ones with the most access to credit and credit has long replaced merit. Merit says that there were people who developed ideas for flying cars decades ago; Credit says that they never got the financing to get off the ground ( get it? Off the ground, flying cars!!!…never mind). Credit allowed white factory workers to get $200k to buy a home in the suburbs and only allowed his black foreman $110k to find a home in the city because that’s all the homes cost where they thought he SHOULD live. The banks were not interested in giving him access to homes in places they didn’t feel he belonged. Banks used credit to steer people into the communities DESPITE merit. This example is often cited and always shows up in government testing, Despite the persistent dogma to the contrary. In case you haven’t noticed what this normally causes to happen is in any “intergrated” middle or upper-class community the non-white is 1-3 classes above their white neighbors. Black doctors can get the credit to live next to white roofing contractors, when he parks his top of the line audi in the drive way all he can see is a sea of contractor vans and trucks and modest home vehicles. The real kicker is that all the whispers are about how he is the one bringing the value down and how could he get the money to afford one of the homes. This is not an attempt to elicit “white guilt” which seems to be an oxymoron at best but to set the premise for offering a solution for this horrific quagmire we find ourselves in.

The banks stunted innovation and used credit to skew merit and so the public much the same as industry began to believe their own press. That merit must be color coded, the car companies that had the most money, have the best cars. The brokerages with the most market share and locations offered the best service. What separated you from the poor people in the social underbelly was your willingness to work hard. Well it’s time to wake up!! Now no one can stand now that the king making banks are closing off the lines of credit and hoarding all the money. The best part is that they simply changed the standards arbitrarily, until now you didn’t know it was arbitrary and really didn’t care as long as you were chosen. Now hard work isn’t enough, size of the company isn’t enough as the spicket to all your advantages is turned off. All of a sudden companies that have been around forever off of “merit” don’t seem able to survive solely based on the quality of their business. So car companies are told to sell cars if they need money and they can’t imagine trying to survive like that and no one will “buy” the cars. The problem is most people never buy cars, the banks told them they had enough “merit” to deserve the credit to access the car they wanted in exchange for interest payments to allow the bank to profit. Most people did not save and write a check for their home, car, clothing and furnishings and most people who did; don’t really have anything that anyone would envy.

So to reverse engineer the problem will help in understanding the solution. When this most recent symptom arose the solutions were idiotic at best because they were based on this credit = merit myth. I ran out and immediately said if the underlining assets are mortgages then the efforts should be focused on keeping the home “owners” in place. What everyone else decided from the blog sites to governments was that the people who were suffering with these predatory loans were not victims. In the twisted warped reality stoked by the media was a version where the banks were the victims of bad underserving people trying to game the system. The banks were also the victim of governments requiring private organizations that receive public funds from everyone treat everyone the same. What a ridiculous idea that people who pay in their money be considered for having it LOANED back to them. The banks pumped that version through the central banks to the governments and media to the public and received trillions in infusions as everyone spurned the homeowners. A year later the western governments and public found that they had once again been successful in keeping homeownership out of the hands of hardworking deserving people but everything was worse. How could this be? Didn’t we just sacrifice all of these families on the alter of the banks to save ourselves? Yes, but the banks demand more sacrifice, the terms are now give the banks more and more money and power while they throw more families and business into the sacrificial pit. Finally everyone woke up and realized that no one or nothing was immune, things keep getting worse and worse while the banks continue to demand more and more. It’s your fault, the media, government and public told them that they were “too big to fail” no sacrifice was too big, saving corrupt titans was paramount to all things. The answer is still what it was a year ago; start at the BOTTOM and work your way UP. Create public jobs and finance homes of the workers. Double welfare and social assistance checks to stimulate consumption. Issue massive government grants to business and start-ups. Ignore the conservatives, there is not a single one alive who doesn’t owe his station in life to these solutions being put into place after the depression and world war. Americans conservatives who owe their class to the G.I. bill and the new deal or Europe which would be living in the stone age without the marshall plan. I have no respect for people who want to burn the ladder once they climb up. Massive government iniatives were the foundation of modern prosperity, all rigged faux merit systems bring is bursting bubbles. If you prefer faux merit and bursting wealth bubbles to real merit then you are going to find yourself isolated as a selfish throwback to a failed dogma. This ruin that we are all suffering in is the direct result and so the proponents of this failed state will now spend their time as the voiceless and disenfranchised but at least they earned stigma; finally merit at work.

Economic crisis solution : middle-class needs to grow and stop leeching off the poor

The first thing that should happen is the ELECTED leaders of the g-7 should issue individual executive orders for banks to add liquidity and stop hoarding infusions or face penalty of government loan lock-out.Currently banks around the world have been receiving billions in infusions to provide liquidity and refuse to pass on taxpayer dollars to taxpayers. That is the entire problem. There is no reason for it to be an imperative that these faux private institutions to have the discretion over the entire global economy. Money flows from taxpayer to treasury to the central bank where it is given to private banks to lend to the public their own money at loan-shark rates. It's a quasi free-market system of private profits and public risk. If it is not fixed now, it won't be fixed until it actually collapses completely. The banking cartel has created the biggest criminal hoax in history. Banks are now an extra middle-man and are currently clogging the system by receiving endless taxpayer infusions(half trillion today while you're reading this) and refused to pass them on. This open fact of cash hoarding banks is in the background as people try to blame first time home-owners and the poor, instead of laying it all at the feet of the banks and the cowardice governments that allow them to write all the rules and regulations.

Rules that defeat every suggestion for consumer protection. That rid the market place of innovation and competition as everything that isn't part of the socialistic banking welfare program is a scam and fraud. I told you when I set up aid4families that the difference was not risk but socialism. That I wasn't doing the same old dance you get from all the other firms and banks which was to tell you that I was totally competent but if I'm not, the government will fix it. That's what everyone considered to be "safe" investments, without understanding any of the details. Fraudsters and scammers can barely get any ink as the biggest fraud in history unravels. Now everyone has an opinion on what should be done but spent the past few years trying to shut me up that there was even a problem. Today everyone and the banking system was suppose to be chugging along smoothly, while I sat in jail for questioning the divine wisdom of the system. Instead, I'm typing this while watching my warnings come to life before my eyes. IT IS TIME TO PLACE BLAME, IT IS TIME TO HOLD PEOPLE ACCOUNTABLE, ME AND ANYONE ELSE WHO CHALLENGED THIS FINANCIAL OLIGARCHY HAS BEEN QUICKLY BLAMED, JUDGED AND CONDEMNED! It will never be the same again, this is not '87 or 2000, it's the culmination of quickly trying to paper over '87 and 2000. How can we save a flawed, fraudulent system? by passing on generations of debt? Nope, not going to happen.

The poor were the plug in this septic bath that kept everyone else afloat. People who pay 10 -20% of their income in consumption taxes for roads that loop-hole chasing, tax abatement, offshore accounting businesses use. The poor who pay 20 - 30% in interest on secured credit cards, cars and homes, so the rest you can enjoy 0%, 2% and 5% rates. It wasn't homes they couldn't afford but interest only loans that increased the monthly payments til they doubled or tripled. Studies also show that most of the people that received these vampire mortgages QUALIFIED for a regular mortgages but lacked choice in lenders because of cultural marginalization i.e. minorities and the poor. Anyone who thinks the people COULDN'T AFFORD the homes has never been outside of their small bumpkin town. If any of you had ever ventured out beyond the town limits, you would quickly find that rent in the city is generally double the amount of suburban and rural mortgages. So the argument that people should have kept paying 1500 in rent instead of getting a $1000 a month mortgage is more than insane. The homeowners asked for relief in the form of steady payments and not letting them go to $2000 and $3000. It was the vampire mortgage not the people. None of the smug jerks who sided with the banks against the homeowners could afford for their mortgage to double twice a year. So if not being able to afford a doubling mortgage payment every few months makes you undeserving, then...

I don't write for contemporary readers because they are indoctrinated to repeat what corporate editors tell their writers to print and teleprompter readers to say when they have no in-depth knowledge on any subject. The importance of what I write is for posterity. When the next generation looks back and wonders why people didn't question the financial system til it crashed I can show that I not only spoke about it but took concrete action to save people. When they wonder why all the solutions for the crash were just ways to set ourselves up for a repeat crash, they will find that I gave a solution based on the actual problem.

So what do we know. That 15months of giving the banks trillions has not freed the credit markets and that the central banks who have more power than the government went ahead and approved a half trillion dollar infusion anyway. After the public rejected the idea. Democracy hasn't eliminated class issues but entrenched them because most people can't think of any solution that doesn't turn over all power and wealth to those self proclaimed better pedigree with elite university degrees from wealthy families. The government will no longer be able to play favorites and subsidize these crooks

Black president to address global economic meltdown

When the wall came crublin, tumblin......doooowwwnn! Aid4families chief is expected to release a video commentary about the current intertwined situations. The video will be released to media outlets worldwide and available online on aid4families.com blogs at blogger and telegraph UK.

Background: in 2006 aid4families was launched as an alternative to the greed based global financial system. The program focused on cost savings of lower overhead and streamlined logistics to benefit program participants. Ignored, mocked and ridiculed the program was still able to develop a loyal following of progressive and well-read clients who were able to weigh risk objectively. By mid 2007 the program had built a head of steam and was on course to rival the entrenched financial structure. Regulators, enforcement and media who played large roles in the success of top-heavy bank culture, now went out to dismantle and discredit the more equitable alternative. In the absence of a crime the autorite in quebec elected to issue a cease and desist order, then several months later after that failed to produce a single complaint or derail the program, they moved to seize the company funds. By blocking payouts they contacted depositors to force them to complain to the rcmp. The RCMP aware of the deception by the regulators continued the rouse panicking the victims of their plot. The crown unable to build a case from the deceptions embarked on a campaign of no-shows for court dates, breaches and delays. Midway through the trial they received a six week delay and now are enjoying a six month break after a parade of witnesses and documents failed to provide a hint of guilt and ends in a whimper.

Currently:The entire globe is plagued with the endless fallout of blind unqualified trust in the financial system and corruption. Politicians, enforcement and media are tripping over themselves to condemn the rampant greed and fraud that ruled finance. This after years of arresting and reporting fraud convictions of anyone who dared challenge socialistic banking system. When aid4families condemned the practices, we were maligned as marginal and disaffected. When we informed the public that deposits to institutions worldwide were bounced around in an endless ponzi scheme people tried to put criminality on us. We're still here but Northern rock, UBS, Bear Stearns, Scotia Bank and Wamu will never be the same. I can wait to add my 2 cents because I have been posting the current crisis online for a few years straight and everything that is being said by experts and politicians is easily found in anything I published at least 6 months ago or 2 years ago. The focus of the video will be what I always post about, which is what is going to happen next and what can be done about it. It will be up to the public to listen to the people who lied to them and have come up with the wrong answer EVERYTIME or someone with the proven track record of the truth despite the ridicule and persecution it visited upon us.

The picture of moses makes clear the fact that as regulators and others looked to punish us for telling the truth, God has visited an endless plague on the corrupt and it followers. Now to smash that golden calf you guys are worshipping.

The Great Canadian Ponzi Scheme with scotia bank and the caisse

Ya gotta love the internet, it really adds meaning to the term desktop publishing. I mean a story like this that doesn't fit mainstream doctrine, would never see the light of day. Readers reach my blogs by searching what they WANT to read about rather than what some talentless writer and corporation wants to TELL them about. Today the media wanted to sell the public on the BS that bank failures are good. The headlines were "no angry customers" you have to read the story to find out that these 2 banks in the american southwest were taken over and changed over without notifying the customers of any problems. It also took place over the weekend, so people will wake up monday morning with another bank holding their mortgage and credit cards, the bank name that they print company checks on is now defunct (but good--lol). All of this dancing to mask the fact of mult-level, multi-generational corruption. I've been asking for nearly a year for the so-called depositor and investment insurance programs to surface and here they are, writing checks out of taxpayers pockets. I already said the crisis would be deeper than they told you last year, that banks would close etc. Now when I watch the news, they are interviewing the same advertisers who got it wrong. Look me up, I said the solution to the mortgage crisis was to save the mortgages not send it to the bankers who would steal the infusions and rate cuts. They did it their way and here we are as they realize that greed only made their situation worse. I watched the media play mouthpiece for their advertisers, talking up central bank action and pissing on homeowner "bailouts". Now that the treasury secretary and central banks have to face reality, the media is still happy to parrot their ramblings. Each week when the bad data comes in they talk about unexpected dips or declines(who didn't expect it? advertiser analyst?). Then they try to talk the markets up for a day to say a number beat expectations (one that's been put excessively low to give it a good headline) ex. company X posted a 10 trillion $ lost instead of the 20 trillion analyst predicted. The "analyst" don't seem to be too good at predicting stuff -huh. Maybe it's the problem like the media and rating agencies, it's hard to be objective when you're being paid. A true media would have alerted the public that these banks were going to collapse, instead of printing advertiser talking points as news. Too many "anal -lyst" have too much vested interest in steering the outcome with their predictions and "expectations".

Against this cancerous backdrop, I bring you the rant de jour. During our witch drowning trial, the prosecution has been hanging it's hat on something called a ponzi scheme. Now running a revolutionary organization rest assured nose-picking dimwits throw it around like yo momma jokes. When it comes to actual law, justice and evidence, I would hope that slanders and smoke would need some support in fact. Despite the fact that it is part of public record that the practices of aid4families worked in complete contradiction to a ponzi scheme, it still lingers out there. So I wondered to myself, hey self "yeees, how may I help...myself" is there anyway to find a concrete definition of ponzi scheme that constitutes the legal understanding? So I went to the rcmp website, I don't constantly go to governments sites like the way sodec and government of canada pawns frequent mine but I may follow a governmental visitor. At the RCMP site, what do we find? The official definition of ponzi scheme according to them.

Everyday, I select stories, articles and other information to keep for future reference. This things get swept under the rug and the coalition of corruption changes it's tune. When that happens reality takes a hit. All of a sudden the bush administration never said iraq was tied to 9-11 or WMDs, the fed is DEMANDING that the government take a role in the sub-prime crisis and not leave it up to them and the markets, all of a sudden "the surge" is the measure of judgment rather than the stupidity of cheer-leading a colonial war. In my situation, that means the stories about abcp and sub-prime have a very short shelf life, quickly purged by the media archives. Google -montreal accord or scotia abcp in a news search or even a websearch won't give you any indepth criticism from the mainstream. I found an article from november, where the process of the abcp was explained in some detail so we could overlay something that has not raised a single eyebrow in the political, judicial, regulatory or enforcement community in nearly 2 decades.

The findings shouldn't shock anyone. The canadian system has been locking up people forever using the ponzi scheme catch-all, while steering people back to the banks who would never practice such foolishness. Au contraire mon frere, ABCP was licensed, sanction, regulated and everyone was aware of the duplicity of telling the public that they defined ponzi as fraud while giving their masters a free pass. Tsh tsh tsh what's a corrupt country to do, well first order of business is try and shut me up for putting a chart on my website warning people of how banks soil money (clean to dirty). Second, canada's favorite past time, blame america. The headlines are "canadian economy strong DESPITE american crisis" no mention that the american economy IS the canadian economy. It is a total coincidence that the other white english speaking nation is in the g-8 and canada's stability and prosperity have no relation to america, only canadian ills. Yet canadian ABCP couldn't get a good rating from other rating agencies, so a canadian one did the dirty work, canadians didn't buy abcp on their trips to florida but through canadian banks and agents not knowing they were tied to american vulture credit. They say that canadian banks have lost less than the banks in europe, u.s. and asia (never mentioning how much smaller they are) or that canada should have less exposure to american mortgages than american banks. Fortunately my dreams are realized, thanks to the internet the canucks refuse to be spoon-fed and when I read this bay street propaganda for what passes for media in this country, the comments are heartwarming. When the bank of canada said the crisis was over in canada a few weeks ago, the comments were livid. That same bank of canada now wants more power to match the 3rd world dictatorial powers that the other central banks have demanded as ransom to stop the crisis. Neither one of these old guard solutions are having the desired effect. Aid4families.com is still up while bear stearns is shuttered and regulators & politicians play catch-up on a backlog of rampant corruption. When we look back on this era and recount it for our children and grandchildren, I'll be the guy that stood up and told the truth and many others will be the ones who hid themselves or argued with the guy who told the truth. That's it.

http://www.reportonbusiness.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20071116.r-cover17/BNStory/Business/home

http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/scams/ponzi_e.htm

http://www.reuters.com/article/bondsNews/idUSN2142680620080721

http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=670380

How the west was lost

Here we are 18 months into this ill-conceived coup of aid4families. 2 countries throwing every public and private tool at us, while collapsing under the weight of their own ineptitude and corruption. Canadian justice justifying attacks on aid4families, while giving places like BMO and Scotia legal immunity for corruption. Canadians were raped up the ass so bad that they had to start a facebook support group to deal with the largest financial debacle in canadian history. Meanwhile trains and planes in the u.s., u.k. and the eurozone are safe from osama because the public puppets are bringing the west to it's knee's faster than any hi-jacker.

I'm not going to say I fucking told you so for the 1000th time because if you can't face the truth, if no one has the integrity to admit their mistakes NOW, I can't have ANY respect for them. NOT aid4families but WHERE should they have put their money? UBS? NORTHERN ROCK, LEHMAN, FANNIE MAE, SCOTIA, SOCIETE, REAL ESTATE, THE OIL BUBBLE?

All these limp-dick pricks on the internet, that couldn't afford to join the program saying it was a scam are hiding under the blankets in there parents basement. There was never anyway to justify slandering us without justifying the practices of the current public and private financial world. Usually the media loves these fraud stories but the media is hiding from this one. It seems that aid4families will be around long after the u.s. and canada are annexed by hugo chavez. Long after mugabe chases all the corruption out of the u.k. and eurozone. Over the last year and a half the more determined the banks their pawns and surrogates were the worse things got in the global economy. "GOD don't like ugly". People didn't lose confidence in bear stearns, northern rock or scotia abcp because of a smear campaign by some quasi government agency like aid4families was by the amf. They had the government holding them up, the media singing their praises and internet pricks happy to do business with them and yet, nothing can save them. Nor can anything break us.

No dream team just duty counsel from legal aid and the crowns' case is still an empty suit. No wonder they offered us no jail time to avoid the trial. I'm not taking no chances at trial because punks on forums don't constitute facts, bank corrupt practices or malice in the legal system isn't evidence. The ballots are in, the debate is finished and the only undisputed fact is that I am still the only motherfucker who knew what the fuck he was talking about. PERIOD. Who is going to help YOUR victims, who trusted you and put their money elsewhere? That's the only question, that remains, the only one. There's no point in the media hiding, there's no point staying off the forums hoping for a miracle because it's not coming, there's no point adding wrongful conviction to all the other public and private corruption involved in creating and keeping these charges alive.

I never said " no comment" I never "categorically" denied anything, I've been very plain that ANYONE who tells you that I didn't have the means or intention to meet the terms of our program was telling you a goddamn lie! I've been publishing for 9 months straight, telling anyone to put up, that time is passing, so now it's time for everyone to SHUT UP, I actually meant to say SHUT THE FUCK UP!!! Because you wouldn't know a sound investment from a door knob. The longer the central banks and politicians define fraud as organizations that aren't greasing their palm then this current crisis will continue. If they ever find the balls to make these guys play by the rules the rest of us have to or become half as critical of them as they are of us, maybe they could avoid some of these meltdowns in the future(so don't hold your breath).

What's next? The ghost of shylock form the merchant of venice. Shylock looked to have the system show the same vigor on his behalf as it does when it's persecuting. The answer of course is the system reflects society as masters of duplicity. The media, forum punks, banks or government cared what their empty slanders did to the people who joined aid4families and none are lining up to take responsibility for misleading people. But to quote our good friend shylock "And if you wrong us, shall we not revenge?"

aid4families $145M est. loss due to ABCP double standard

OH WOW!!! OVER 2000 REAL VICTIMS AND NO ARREST!!

This week aid4families returns to court and across the country parties in the $32Billion debacle return as well. Aid4families will be facing the crown and rcmp who need to build a fraud case to justify the indictment. The crown, rcmp, nor regulators will be attending the Asset backed commercial paper(abcp) hearing on whether investors will be able to sue for fraud at their own expense. In the past several days the major banks reported continued red ink due to their involvement in the u.s. subprime crisis for the second quarter.

Since last fall people who trusted the major banks and their divisions have been betrayed by a justice system paralyzed by hypocritical corruption. Aid4families which had no canadian clients and was not part of a customer uproar fell victim to regulatory malice. Meanwhile the same system failed hundreds of canadian citizens who were being bullied into a lopsided deal. One that requires them to exchange their 30-60 day notes into 3200 day notes after being delayed from their money for nearly a year already. In addition the main sticking point was in order to get this rape in the exithole, they would have to agree to not seek damages for being swindled.

Note to self--add purdy crawford to speed dial. Regulators and enforcement agencies refuse to even read about it in the paper, so they don't have to justify their inaction. One would assume that standard procedure was to raid the offices of scotia bank and toronto dominion headquarters, arrest the executives and issue consumer alerts not to deal with the major banks in canada. Well that's what happened to us(so I'm just saying ;). When you have a country with no banking system and allow the financial industry to dictate the rules, then you're bound to get the people shafted.

We have non-client detractors and I gleefully ignore them since I've spent thousands of words explaining the financial crisis. Anyone still calling aid4families a scam has no credibility when they fail to condemn real criminality.
Also in the news is the need for an additional pension plan because the CPP is a leaky titanic. Canadian regulators rushed to push aid4families from the market so people could be sold this abcp garbage with the trusted institutions. 10 months and 32billion later, I'm asking "hows dat workin' for ya" like Dr. Phil. What I suggest is that these investors sue regulators and enforcement agencies for their concerted inaction. Regulators for their blind endorsement, along with rating agencies which have been the biggest parasites in the global crisis. Regulators and ratings have played a crucial role in the fraud of legitimate banking and safe investments.

The final crooks I would like to throw under the bus before I go. Freddie Mac the governments mortgage program(u.s.), like so many of these $#^^@ is giving advice on how to avoid fraud!!! This agency deceived investors by misreporting their income by 43% and had been doing so for years. Then paid $410Million to settle a class action. The punishment, pay a fine and keep doing what you are doing. So that's how it goes organizations with victims and complaints get carte blanche and maybe spend some of their ill gotten gains as hush money without admitting fault. While decent programs are chased away to limit choices for the public. It's been a few years and we still don't have anyone that can explain why we are a scam. All we can say for sure is that no one with their morals or principles on a sliding scale can be taken seriously. Not regulators, enforcement, nerds in their parents basements or anyone else that is too cowardice to assist true suffering victims of real crimes.

Regulatory capture: The hands that tighten the banks noose

Everyone can sense that we are at a critical juncture in history. It is not often that the foundations of society are available to be greatly influenced. Generally, that is an acceptance of the status quo with only minor adjustments. In these times only the most vigilant rally to perfect the system, everyone else is resigned and are not inclined get involved. Elections, conflicts and now the economy are on the tongues of even the most passive as devastation engulfs the entire globe. At the apex is a perfect storm of policy, governance, greed and corruption. Politics of fear to feed the greed in a conflict for a commodity and to enrich arms manufacturers. It cannot be overstated that the sheer cohesion of powers combined against humanity is a massive foe. What is the fate of a disparate global public against powerful combined interest of global corruption?

Right now we are facing the expansion of a commodity bubble. To find relief from the problem, you need to first find the source. The damned speculators--people getting rich on the bet oil will go up and constantly driving it up to enrich themselves. Banks and governments say that they are powerless against these gamblers, thriving at the publics expense.
When you scratch beneath the surface you will find that most market speculation is dominated by the banks, industry and government. It actually makes sense, since government and industry would be the vested party's in any market.
Yet they offer us this faceless whipping boy called speculator. Government has blown oil prices on everything from production to storage. It lets the oil giants strong arm smaller governments into selfish deals then profit when the people retaliate by destroying a refinery or pipeline. This exercise in absurdity is the case from the Nigerian delta to Iraq. Then there's Venezuela an Iran, two large oil producers being constantly antagonized with western governments working in collusion with oil giants to guide policy, these countries are living on the cash of their oil while flatlining the u.s. currency. Chavez is winning his battle with Exxon and the attempt to starve Iran into regime change has the American people starving to change with a president who has the lowest approval rating ever. The public had no say in the central bank bailouts but white house resident bush doesn't want the taxpayers to spend billions rewarding speculators. There's that word again so to be clear let's define speculator in this instance(markets) a speculator is an investor who will never take delivery of the commodity. This is to say that brokers on the exchanges who purchase wheat, oil, sugar etc never expect a truck to arrive at their homes to deliver 50 tons corn.
In the mortgage market these securities where bought and sold by people who had no idea where the homes where or who bought them, they only looked to profit from the payments made. Those people have been spared the worst case by taxpayer backed interventions into the markets, though they are the only true speculators(along with the banks and brokerages who packaged and sold it). The so-called speculators that governments are refusing to assist are people who may have purchased a second home hoping to rent it out for extra income. Some chose a home that they considered a bargain and planned to invest in it to sell it at market prices. MOST examples leave you with people involved with the individual sell and purchase of a property. Refusing them the same deal as the ACTUAL speculators and pointing at them having to give up on a property is criminal.
So here we are, time to talk tough. With no serious review the fed has been able to put the taxpayers on the hook for hundreds of billions. The oil giants like the banks laugh off government grandstanding. What government can reign in Citibank, shell and haliburton at the same time? Regulators have a job that is born in conflict, to advance the industry against global competition while guarding the public trust. It's stupid on the face of it, how can you be vigilant in restraining someone that you are obligated to advance? In an ideal world a strong national banking industry would be best for the public. What has happened in practical terms is that banks are protected from the public and are sacrificed for the greater banking "good". Every step of the way, agents for the public discuss changes with the banks to get cooperation and what always comes out of it is a threat from the banking industry. The threat always gets the headline to strike fear into the public. Currently and new regulations would force banks to tighten credit and call loans AND raise fees and... Basically they're going to rob the public and all regulators can do is agree to HOW. Every time the grandstanding fades from the headlines and in the backrooms the deal is the same. Generally they will be able to come together to blame a faceless entity and make firm regulations to block competition with something like wealth based licensing or cash minimums. This protects the public from new entrants who become the problem and further erodes the power of the public.
The laws that come out of these conspiracies against the public all look the same. The wording is some catchall like fraud or licensing that allows regulators grand sweeping power to rid the markets of new competitors. Scammers, spammers and crooks are paraded out to look effective, while the big culprits benefit twice, once from being overlooked and the second by getting rid of competition without spending a dime. When you go to government sites and read what to look for when it comes to fraud, there isn't a bank on earth that could escape the definition but they can escape enforcement. They bury terms in contracts, change conditions among other things and use the law to their advantage. When you signed the documents, the disclosure was there, in legalese, in small print on the 8th page you signed. They send you a letter to inform you of a rate change, now that you are well in debt, the law requires them to give you 30days notice to pay them $20k in cash so that your balance isn't calculated at the new tripled interest rate. If a new competitor employed these tactics every media organization, court and enforcement agency would tar them with fraud without a hint of irony.

Every year it gets harder to bring a case against a major financial institution, while fees and deceptions bring in larger profits. Bankers associations are huge campaign donors and are a strong lobby. Regulators and politicians come out of the industry and people from the industry are chosen to be regulators. Two countries in north America ruled by one brokerage. Goldman Sachs alumni Mark Carney (bank of Canada) and Henry Paulson (treasury sec. USA), they should find cooperation with each other and the industry. What's better is neither is a regulator, they simply set the tone for regulators and act as industry surrogates. Incest between industry and government is nothing new. Top executives are always considered the experts and receive government posts with industry endorsement as an inside man. Very few politicians don't see public service as a stepping stone to lofty positions in industry they expect to peddle their knowledge and relationships to the highest bidder.

What can be done. Yes, media, government, activist, public and academia have all taken turns decrying the woes of the common man against greedy industrial interest. Fortunately I am not a professional belly-acher but a visionary pioneer. While others picketed, petitioned, plead, and published I imposed aid4families. In that spirit, here are a few changes that may help. Pick one: government service or industry but not both. With no incentive of cushy jobs after they leave office some politicians may actually focus on their job. Of course people still have to eat so a set time limit should suffice if a person chooses to leave public service. This is a very specific example, whereas the things that generally make it tempting are stripped away. If you serve on the banking committee then you would be barred for no less than 5 years from holding any board or position with interaction with regulators or government. You could be a branch manager or in accounting or IT at the bank where you can comply with regulations but not influence them. If you come from industry, you may not serve on a body that regulates your primary industry. The spirit of these proposals is the important element, the details can be hammered out. Create a jury duty for important government regulations. A basic trial can be held in court in the evening where the pros and cons are argued. The concerns and finding by the jury would be addressed at a public hearing for approval by the government. Finally, like all things, enforce the laws on the books biased enforcement have caused this carte blanche with the industry and banks act as co-regulators, holding funds, reporting competitors etc. The government wouldn't invite drug dealers to draft drug dealing policy, they simply draft consequences and enforce them. The government has to become more than just the PR department for industry interest groups. The government is not there to force the public to yield to industry greed, the role of government is to make sure that industry works for the public. We need to not just fear STATE RUN INDUSTRY but an INDUSTRY RUN STATE!


These reports about industry are from the imf, sec and media, I know how you like it when they tell you.

http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2006/wp0634.pdf



http://www.nypost.com/seven/10312007/business/sec_eyes_goldman_sachs_good_fo.htm

http://www.deepcapture.com/category/3-regulatory-capture-the-sec/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_Securities_Litigation_Reform_Act

While investors writhe in pain the sipc stalks aid4families

Investor calls to the SIPC probably aren't returned because they are busy stalking us. ( actual visit )

Have you no shame?!?!? I couldn't take time to write yesterday due to court were the crown was a no-show for the second time in 5 months. Though the crown was attempting to avoid another setback we did receive a visit from the sipc. Now the inbreds in their parents basement, media and corrupt government and industry hacks would like you to believe that we're the problem. Why would an agency that should be burning the midnite oil making investors whole from taking part in the greatest economic sham in generations be pestering us? I would hope that it's not to intimidate us. That hasn't worked, everyone whoever said anything bad about the organization has been taken to the woodshed and there hasn't been a peep on the internet in 6 months. Like the man says "accounts of my demise...". I don't know while I'm fighting government, industry and media organizations to a standstill, why a half-baked shell group like the sipc would expect to have an effect that they couldn't.


The sipc like the cipf here in canada should be broke by now, since their low cash balance can't cover the fraudulent losses investors are suffering right now. It has been one year since the amf issued the now infamous and ill advised cease and desist order. Now the rcmp and crown are unhappy after being goaded into this wild goose chase. It's all boiled down to an endless tally of actionable damages that end with a lot of zeroes. How did this happen? Well every pimpled geek and industry hatchett man decided to try and bury the organization, AGAINST THE INTEREST OF THE PEOPLE WHO WERE ACTUALLY PARTICIPATING IN THE PROGRAM!!!! Unfortunately they picked the worst year to cheerlead the corrupt banking industry. It looks totally different a year later to try and call us a scam while the world economy burns and the government and industry get into a finger pointing match. I didn't tell people that there was a such thing as investor's insurance so they wouldn't go broke like they are. I didn't tell them that there money sits safely at the bank ungambled. I didn't tell people that banks and brokerages would always be liquid and wouldn't have to search for cash and bail outs. I didn't give risky assets high credit ratings. I didn't spend the past year lying about the health of the economy or banks. The media hasn't printed a thing the rcmp or crown has said since the first week in november because we told them to get the facts straight. The media believes the opposite of what your mother taught you, they believe if you can't say anything bad...then don't say anything at all--so the silence has been defeafening across the entire internet. See, people can say what they want but I'm telling them in plain language that they are lying and daring them to prove anything they say. People hiding behind avatars, profiles and agencies can say what they want but don't let your ego goad you into a situation where you have to put up or shut up. There was a line around the block of people wanting to talk the talk, now running like roaches with the lights on when it's time to walk the walk.

Back to the sipc. I'm not picking on them there's plenty of blame to go around in this sham of a shell industry that has brought the economy to it's knee's. The sipc didn't destroy the american economy alone. They provided the guise of security that helped lure unsuspecting investors into the trap. But hey, who is going to arrest them? No one hates deceit, fraud, or theft in any sincere way, now do they? Just when they think they can say it about us, if you switch the word aid4families to bank of montreal, bank of america or jpmorgan they quickly avert their eyes afraid to offend their betters. So you're no advocate, you're a coward. If you weren't you would want to save the public against ALL enemies. The sipc had the nerve to write to our hosting company a few months ago and demand they remove our website(you can see how well that worked out). They tried to make it seem as though our conviction was absolute rather than absurd and like they were some industry regulator(which they aren't). I informed the hosting company that it was not my job to write what the sipc likes and it would not be wise for them to remove the site. Let the sipc go the LEGAL route, not the mobster route. The legal route has worked for them the same way it has for everyone else--a dead end. Then I contacted the d.c. attorney general and made a complaint. I haven't heard back yet about how the AG is raiding the sipc's offices and hauling them off to jail yet. I guess there are those of us who dictate the law and those of us who are simply subject to it.

The post telegraph.co.uk didn't want you to see because it is being run by a few fake bloggers who target blogs outside of their clique.