While investors writhe in pain the sipc stalks aid4families

Investor calls to the SIPC probably aren't returned because they are busy stalking us. ( actual visit )

Have you no shame?!?!? I couldn't take time to write yesterday due to court were the crown was a no-show for the second time in 5 months. Though the crown was attempting to avoid another setback we did receive a visit from the sipc. Now the inbreds in their parents basement, media and corrupt government and industry hacks would like you to believe that we're the problem. Why would an agency that should be burning the midnite oil making investors whole from taking part in the greatest economic sham in generations be pestering us? I would hope that it's not to intimidate us. That hasn't worked, everyone whoever said anything bad about the organization has been taken to the woodshed and there hasn't been a peep on the internet in 6 months. Like the man says "accounts of my demise...". I don't know while I'm fighting government, industry and media organizations to a standstill, why a half-baked shell group like the sipc would expect to have an effect that they couldn't.


The sipc like the cipf here in canada should be broke by now, since their low cash balance can't cover the fraudulent losses investors are suffering right now. It has been one year since the amf issued the now infamous and ill advised cease and desist order. Now the rcmp and crown are unhappy after being goaded into this wild goose chase. It's all boiled down to an endless tally of actionable damages that end with a lot of zeroes. How did this happen? Well every pimpled geek and industry hatchett man decided to try and bury the organization, AGAINST THE INTEREST OF THE PEOPLE WHO WERE ACTUALLY PARTICIPATING IN THE PROGRAM!!!! Unfortunately they picked the worst year to cheerlead the corrupt banking industry. It looks totally different a year later to try and call us a scam while the world economy burns and the government and industry get into a finger pointing match. I didn't tell people that there was a such thing as investor's insurance so they wouldn't go broke like they are. I didn't tell them that there money sits safely at the bank ungambled. I didn't tell people that banks and brokerages would always be liquid and wouldn't have to search for cash and bail outs. I didn't give risky assets high credit ratings. I didn't spend the past year lying about the health of the economy or banks. The media hasn't printed a thing the rcmp or crown has said since the first week in november because we told them to get the facts straight. The media believes the opposite of what your mother taught you, they believe if you can't say anything bad...then don't say anything at all--so the silence has been defeafening across the entire internet. See, people can say what they want but I'm telling them in plain language that they are lying and daring them to prove anything they say. People hiding behind avatars, profiles and agencies can say what they want but don't let your ego goad you into a situation where you have to put up or shut up. There was a line around the block of people wanting to talk the talk, now running like roaches with the lights on when it's time to walk the walk.

Back to the sipc. I'm not picking on them there's plenty of blame to go around in this sham of a shell industry that has brought the economy to it's knee's. The sipc didn't destroy the american economy alone. They provided the guise of security that helped lure unsuspecting investors into the trap. But hey, who is going to arrest them? No one hates deceit, fraud, or theft in any sincere way, now do they? Just when they think they can say it about us, if you switch the word aid4families to bank of montreal, bank of america or jpmorgan they quickly avert their eyes afraid to offend their betters. So you're no advocate, you're a coward. If you weren't you would want to save the public against ALL enemies. The sipc had the nerve to write to our hosting company a few months ago and demand they remove our website(you can see how well that worked out). They tried to make it seem as though our conviction was absolute rather than absurd and like they were some industry regulator(which they aren't). I informed the hosting company that it was not my job to write what the sipc likes and it would not be wise for them to remove the site. Let the sipc go the LEGAL route, not the mobster route. The legal route has worked for them the same way it has for everyone else--a dead end. Then I contacted the d.c. attorney general and made a complaint. I haven't heard back yet about how the AG is raiding the sipc's offices and hauling them off to jail yet. I guess there are those of us who dictate the law and those of us who are simply subject to it.

The post telegraph.co.uk didn't want you to see because it is being run by a few fake bloggers who target blogs outside of their clique.

It's going to be better in the good old days!!

Reason 4.5 A world safe for democracy and hitler


As an indicted person with the government attempting to go all hiroshima on your divine rights, you get to review what protections you actually have in society.

Yes, divine rights, in the u.s. they say "endowed by the creator (and or darwinism)with inalienable". This is a long-winded way to say that the government will be on a unrelenting mission to steal your freedom on behalf of various interest to allow others to run amok(my explanation is actually more long-winded:). Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude shall exist in the united states: it says but wait... EXCEPT AS PUNISHMENT FOR A CRIME. This means, wait for it.............SLAVERY IS STILL LEGAL! That's a beautiful loophole, that has been used to banish more people(and per capita)to bondage than any other nation rich enough to not have to. Hitler would have brought peace(eventually)no tyrant in history has wanted endless fighting, they just want to win first. Once you're in total submission you are free to live in peace but as a defeated group it probably won't feel very peaceful.

The jews weren't rounded up, they were actually asked quite politely to leave. They were offered relocation and received fabricated letters from loved ones saying "come on in, the waters fine". Hitler distributed propaganda reminding blacks and africans that they were fighting for their own oppressors. His mistakes were of course, fighting in africa, russia in winter and immediately declaring war on the usa while it was still reluctant to fight him. So when you mix your actual rights with only minor differences in the outcome of world war two, then you will notice that liberty is much more fragile than one might expect. There were no nazi's just people dispatching their military to remake the world in their own image (and WE defeated fascism?). The german public whipped into a frenzy of encroaching danger and humiliation at the hands of their enemy decided the only way to be free was to dominate. This of course led to greater humiliation and submission to it's rivals. That 1 watt bulb is starting to flicker in your head.

If fascism and slavery are alive and kicking, then what freedom do you ACTUALLY have? Actually is the important part because it means that you can't wake up and find it gone tomorrow? Of course this is canada, not germany or the USA, so everyone is free? Canada doesn't offer any protections. In fairness the canadians have only had say for about 25yrs (1982). So they haven't wanted to write down too many things before they secure their own place in canadian society. The constitution and laws are a mix-matched quilt of french and british with a few new things tacked on to look independent. Since most canadians were around in 1982 (and 1882, get it? because the canadian population is old)canada is like an adult child who has moved away from it's british parent. The country still takes pride in england, with the queen on the money and everywhere else(courts, supermarkets, strip clubs). The U.S. is of course the brother who left home at 15. The american bill of rights is a laundry list of rights to own guns and shoot anyone who tries to take them. It took another 70+ years and a bloody war to partially refine slavery and then another 60 to get to women suffrage. Guns = amendment 2, paid slavery amendment 14 and oh yeah women amendment 19. The canadian system like the american one does say you kinda have even more rights even though they aren't enumerated but in practice it's hard to enforce the ones that are. The differences come from history, where america fought a bloody war and wrote the bill of rights as a F-you, the canadians kind of slid into freedom.
Are wars always labeled noble quest? Generally, the american revolution was about taxes, so it actually could have been worked out and a lot of people didn't appreciate the anti-english rants. The civil war was about labor, half of the north didn't want a freed black population coming to compete for jobs, the same area was flooded again as european immigrants came by the boat loads 70 years later. Again the issues remain contempary, immigrant labor, wage stagnation, working conditions, worker rights, taxation, and slave workers keeping production cost low. Your freedoms are endowed by the creator and are inalienable, they are not to be doled out by any society. Societies controlled by the interest of the day, will constantly look to abridge, circumvent and downright steal your rights.

Since I am in my prime (old and young at the same time: with the body of a god and just enough grey to look...distinquished )it means I am still young enough to speak and act with moral imperatives and still not old enough to think that things can't change for the better. I am too old to lash-out through crime or violence from frustation but young enough to not take no for an answer. With mandela free, a Mlk holiday and the end of the cold war, my generation may have believed that there was no more fights for freedom and justice, we would be wrong. the oft cited poem sheds some light: "First they came"
In Germany, they came first for the Communists, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Communist;

And then they came for the trade unionists, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a trade unionist;

And then they came for the Jews, And I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Jew;

And then . . . they came for me . . . And by that time there was no one left to speak up."

This poem credited to a reformed nazi, reminds us that the prisons can be full since it's those people in the city and let's build them around the world and skip due process, since neither type profile me. I didn't get my shiny pantsuit or flying car because I didn't know about contracts and production means as a child would stiffle innovation. People have nostalgia for the past always remembering a simpler time, while we keep hope for the future to lift the burdens and yokes that cripple the present. So the truth remains: It's going to be better in the good old days.

when you miss me check out my new topical UK blog at
http://my.telegraph.co.uk/aid4families

If U had a million dollars...U would be broke!!!

REASON: 3.5 ...and your mother dresses you funny.


When I started aid4families.com the first page added to the site was a brief summary of why the program was started called save your life. The title was, you're going to be broke. The point was not to make people feel bad or scare them into the program but to remind them to take an objective look at their situation. Paper millionaires are excluded from the millionaires club and most people don't qualify for that. There are towns where small homes or condos go for more than that. The people residing in them rarely qualify as millionaires, although some technical paper measure may allow them to impress their high school classmates. What any first year broker can often show these people is how their net worth is either much lower or negative. One for sure way, is living well beyond their means. This is a fact for most people (despite the hypocritical cries about sub-prime borrowers). To be a 21st century millionaire in a western hypocrisy, it is estimated that it takes between 21 to 700 million dollars to match a millionaire in 1900. With the worlds worst savings rate and wages devastated by cannibalistic inflation, there was no way the average person was going to survive retirement. What was needed for joe six-pack and susie secretary was what every politician, financier and captain of industry enjoys...A big fat bowl of passive income.

Yes, you would never know it from all the whining about income taxes and capital gains taxes beating leukemia for media and political attention. Most people couldn't get their mind around receiving more money than they earn or having money come from no effort on their part. How quaint the bottom 98% must seem to politicians who make more after they leave office or to brokers and CEOs' who make more in bonuses than pay. The primary taboo that I broke was bringing the unwashed masses to the party. The major arguments are: 1. When I made everyone rich, no one would be rich and 2. The rest of you slugs are too lazy to work if you have money(you have to be starved to be productive). For this they use the lottery example, how rare it is for some inbred like yourself to keep their job after winning and then it is usually wasted doing what the bottom 98% does, which is spend it. The problem with that argument is, the people who get rich setting up these lottery schemes are the ones telling you that you won't have to work anymore, this is the same society that demands you spend every dollar you get and then some and finally, working for no or low wages when you come into a huge sum is stupid. Another issue is that the opposite of what I am doing is the current situation. Whereas I risked everyone having money, we are now in a situation where no one has money. No savings and mountains of debt, even the banks and government(despite tone of accountability).

So if you don't have a million dollars, you're going to be on the side of the road with a sign. It's true! It's a setup no savings, huge debt, no retirement until you earn huge medical expenses AND THEY'RE cutting all the social spending, so us rich folk don't have to help your fat pasty butt. As a broker calling accredited investors, I NEVER talked to a millionaire that didn't have a job. Especially since I was calling them at work. This means that wealth is no deterrent to work(poverty maybe) but not greed. The poor made rich don't always know the game, some athletes and entertainers buy mansions for careers that last maybe 5 years in their twenties. They then turn into tabloid fodder. So why do people who swear by incentive based pay for themselves( and still get huge bonuses for running the company and the economy in the toilet) have so much disdain for the prospect of the bottom 98% making it? Cluck if I know, what I don't like is societies telling you that you chose your situation, while keeping 9 of 10 choices off the table. If people CHOOSE to be poor then they have the right to CHOOSE to be rich. Yet, the stampede to stop you bottom feeders from taking the elevator to the penthouse is incredible. I unlike most of you didn't need aid4families to become a millionaire but instead of creating another rich firm enriching rich people, I went and started a private safety net. Now, I can't stand near windows and have hired a royal food taster, nobody assassinates like banks :)

UR a goddamn lie and U don't know whadaF$@% UR talking about

Reason : 2.5 My life is impossibly difficult because people want to believe what they believe instead of believing what they know.

My organization was called a scam or scheme by so many ignorant people (all of which have since disappeared) that I should be rich simply by suing for slander. Generally what kept people from voting with me wholeheartedly was ignorance and a good deal of cowardice. Ignorance because finance and banking is something most people don't have a clue about. This is odd because of course you will go to a bank more times than you go to court or see a doctor but there are no banking dramas on t.v. So people make up how the bank works at work and around the kitchen table. For example what's happening to the economy right now is a call to raise reserve requirements because of decreased confidence in global fiat currency, particularly the dollar hegemony, right?

Several times as people tried to explain to me how banks make money or what they do with money, it sounded like a broken record. The odd thing was when I tell them in places like here or on at aid4families.com people were skeptical, asking where I got MY information. That generally was the reason I covered the page in links to sources they trust. Never mind the fact that I have actually worked for banks and in brokerage firms or study these things for a living OR that I developed my own system. This means I not only KNEW so much about it but was able to go out DO so much about it. This is what I mean about people choosing to believe what they believe. Everyone knows that smoking is bad for you, including smokers but people smoke anyway because they want to BELIEVE that consequences of their habit may not come to pass. The issue is that ignoring problems or lashing out at people who remind you of the facts is no solution.

Here's the second grade explanation I get from everyone about how banks survive. Everyone in town A takes their money to the local bank and then the bank makes money charging interest when they loan it out. So if I have this straight, your bank takes your stank-butt $1000 from all the citizens in the town and then loans out tens of thousands to each person in credit cards, car loans and mortgages and still has money for you to take out of your checking account each week. There are 100 people in town A who leave $1000 with the bank for a total of $100,000, that can be loaned out to everyone for all their credit needs. The average cost of a house in town A is $10,000. How many houses can the bank finance? The bank must also make all of the loans now(i.e. go broke now) for the chance of making a profit on the loan in the next 20 - 30 years. This is the common perception (and I don't know what I'm talking about).

Well it didn't take bankers as long as it is taking the public to understand that if they do it like that it wouldn't work for more than about....an hour. Now what if for every person that signed on to a $10,000 mortgage the bank would be allowed to loan out another $100,000? The government treats the mortgage like cash and allows it to act as the reserve requirement, that can be exchanged for cash, this way the more loans the bank writes the more money it can multiply and lend out. This means for your $100,000 mortgage the bank has been able to lend out another $1,000,000 in imaginary(fiat) dollars. This way banks are allowed to make money off of money that never existed and that they don't have. This works until people decide to check and all start to ask for their money at the same time and of course the bank doesn't have it and so it folds up. Right now it's coming apart and banks are taking huge losses and are trying not to close. What has kept most banks in canada and the u.s. from closing is huge infusions of cash that the government is allowing to be printed so the banks don't run out of money. The big problem that they are having now is that the government is bailing them out of this scheme with cash but the banks won't pass it on to consumers and business, also they are cutting interest rates to encourage borrowing but the banks won't pass on the rate cuts either. All the banks across the world are paranoid and won't loan to each other because they believe that the collateral (remember mortgages for cash) are worthless. So in the U.S. the fed said kcuF it, we'll take these worthless loans and give you cash anyway just so the entire world banking system doesn't collapse. Last weekend at the G-7 meeting the banks were told by the central banks that they can't keep cutting rates and giving cash for them to hoard and that they are going to have to keep more cash on hand in the future(raising reserve limits). The banking industry has been called a scam, ponzi scheme and worse from everyone from economist to world leaders. Bank fees, what the bank charges you for using your money, the forex what the banks charge business and people for converting their money, investments(why banks are taking losses on american securities), credit/debit transaction fees for merchants and customers, these streams along with profits from imaginary money is how banks actually work.

This is why I should have been amazed by anyone calling my wildly transparent organization a scheme. I've challenged everyone from online hacks to law enforcement to say that if any act I am performing is criminal are they willing to criminalize it if they find out it's being done by a company they trust. Everyone to a person looks at their feet out of cowardice. Of course, you're not going to stop banking with scotia or wachovia now that you know it's a scheme. Of course the crown or rcmp isn't going after BMO if they know it's a fragile ponzi scheme that's come home to roost. Of course DOJ or FBI won't be closing BOA or washington mutual. All of these organizations have plenty of customer complaints like paypal and wall st. but there is too much cowardice to be honest about stopping dishonesty. Since no one can be consistent about their outrage, since no one can offer a consistent measure of what constitutes a scam then I can't take anyone seriously. It just means no matter who you are, that ur a goddamn lie and U don't know whadaF$@% UR talking about!

Notice the currency at the top was backed by gold. They don't make 'em like that no more.
http://www.uspirg.org/html/consumer/archives/2005/09/high_creditdebi.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_bank

LMAO ; U think'd u were going

REASON 1.5 Are you on the road to prosperity or is it thanks for playing?

With losses in the trillions, billions per bank, don't expect your ticket in the mail. The magic carpet ride that conservatives tout about letting industry run amok at the expense of the taxpayers, has limited seating. Many are STILL saying that this is the way to go. PLUS tax cuts, PLUS government spending on war contractors, PLUS bailouts, just unrelenting insanity. The problem is that I know what kind of kick-backs these politicians and officials are getting but why are so many regular folk duped. These people, who aren't wealthy and don't actually benefit in any significant way, say more than the people they are defending. They are still screaming that there were WMD's when the administration itself has abandoned it. When it comes to the bailouts for the banks, they complain about billions being proposed for homeowners while giving the banks a free pass. It's reporters making less than six figures and other saps who have to squeeze all of their assets together to get over 100k net worth.

These people should be fighting with the rest of us for more equality in wealth distribution. Unfortunately, they're nameless peons at mega-corporations who hope that the size of their employer inflates their opinion or worth. By abandoning their own self interest, either by misguided principle or a misguided sense of loyalty, they believe the feeling is mutual. Here's a clue. It's not! At the top of the global food chain are these bankers and brokers who have bonuses larger than 90% of the populations salary. Above that is the puppeteer of world economies, the IMF. Now these money generators and king makers are definitely not part of the bottom 98%. Millions in Christmas bonuses (each), bouncing national economies in the direction they deem most selfish. Guess what!!!..... A lot of them aren't going either. They were smug, felt impervious, supported bias economic policies, and their reward.......wait for it.......A pink slip. The IMF is laying off 15% of its God-complex staff. In the past nine months, banks have dropped 34,000 employees and the central banks still have their finger in the dike. Now even the G-7 are saying that restraints are needed. Despite all of this, many of the neo-nuts and corporate media will still be parroting old talking points, defending positions that the actual villains have abandoned. Remember? WMD's not an invasion, not a civil war, not an occupation, not a recession, not a bailout......Well, mission accomplished - LOL :)